Contact Us Care Directory Managed Clinical Network Services - Cancer & Palliative Care Links to Related Websites
 

M

C

N
E
T
W
O
R
K

 

 

 

 

 

 

M

C

N
E
T
W
O
R
K

 

 

 

 

 

 

M

C

N
E
T
W
O
R
K

 

 

 

 

 

 

M

C

N
E
T
W
O
R
K

 

 

 

 

 

 

M

C

N
E
T
W
O
R
K

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

M

C

N
E
T
W
O
R
K

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

M

C

N
E
T
W
O
R
K

 

 

 

 

 

 

M

C

N
E
T
W
O
R
K

 

 

 

 

 

 

M

C

N
E
T
W
O
R
K

 

 

 

 

 

 

M

C

N
E
T
W
O
R
K

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

M

C

N
E
T
W
O
R
K

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

M

C

N
E
T
W
O
R
K

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

M

C

N
E
T
W
O
R
K

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

M

C

N
E
T
W
O
R
K

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

M

C

N
E
T
W
O
R
K

 

 

 

 

 

 

M

C

N
E
T
W
O
R
K

 

 

 

 

 

 

M

C

N
E
T
W
O
R
K

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

M

C

N
E
T
W
O
R
K


     

Proposed Managed Clinical Network in Palliative Care in Scottish Borders

Framework for Managed Clinical Networks in Palliative Care - Scottish Partnership Agency

MEL (1999)10: Introduction of Managed Clinical Networks Within the NHS in Scotland - The Scottish Office. (Currently unavailable)

HDL (2000)10: Managed Clinical Networks in Palliative Care - Scottish Executive

Acute Services Review Report - The Scottish Office
SECTION 2: Clinical Networking (Managed Clinical Networks)

Clinical Standards Board for Scotland - Palliative Care
1. Education & Training

2. Assessment & Care Planning
3. Equipment
4. Drugs
5. Symptom Management

 

MANAGED CLINICAL NETWORK in PALLIATIVE CARE
A DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL FOR THE SCOTTISH BORDERS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

  EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1 BACKGROUND

2 AIMS
2.1 Primary aim
2.2 Secondary Aims

2.3 Other primary care orientated MCNs

3 WHY DEVELOP A NETWORK

4 CLINICAL COMPONENTS OF THE NETWORK
4.1 Symptom management
4.2 Assessment and care planning
4.3 Equipment
4.4 Drugs
4.5 Education and training
4.6 Communication and continuity of care
4.7 Feedback for health professionals on their performance

5 COVERAGE, MEMBERSHIP, STRUCTURE & MANAGEMENT
5.1 Coverage
5.2 Membership and structure
5.3 Management

6 INVOLVEMENT OF PATIENTS & CARERS

7 EVALUATION OF THE PROJECT
7.1 Audit facilitator
7.2 Baseline audit
7.3 Audit and final evaluation
7.4 Annual report

8 CLINICAL GOVERNANCE

9 APPLICATION FOR FUNDING - HOW DOES IT FIT WITH PRIORITIES

10 BIBLIOGRAPHY

Appendices
1 Practice visit discussion document
2 Network structure and management
3 Group roles and memberships
4 Management structure
5 Financial implications of training
6 Out of hours handover form
7 Newsletter

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Scottish Partnership Agency has produced a report detailing a Framework for a Managed Clinical Network (MCN) in Palliative Care and the Scottish Executive has asked for applications to pilot such an MCN (HDL 2000 10). This paper outlines a proposal for the development of a pilot MCN in Palliative Care in the Borders.

It refers to developments in palliative care which have already taken place within the Borders and lists the new initiatives which have occurred since the appointment of a Macmillan GP Facilitator.

The aims and potential benefits of a Borders MCN are discussed. A framework for its development based on the Core Standards for Palliative Care identified by the Clinical Standards Board for Scotland and the SIGN Guidelines for the Management of Pain in Patients with Cancer is detailed under the headings:

  • Symptom Management
  • Assessment and Care Planning
  • Equipment
  • Drugs
  • Education and Training
  • Communication and Continuity of Care
  • Feedback for Health Professionals on their Performance

The proposal relates its aims to the stated priorities of the NHSiS.

The method to be followed in the development of the MCN is documented.

Associated costs in terms of setting up and running the MCN are listed and sources of funding identified.

1 BACKGROUND

1.1 MCNs have been set up in Scotland at a regional level for some of the major cancers with the intention that this concept is extended further. The Scottish Partnership Agency has produced a working party report detailing a "Framework for a Managed Clinical Network in Palliative Care"(4) and areas to pilot these are being sought. Additionally the Clinical Standards Board for Scotland (CSB) have produced Core Standards for Palliative Care(5) and the SIGN Guidelines for the Management of Pain in Patients with Cancer(6) have recently been published.

1.2 A recent study looking at Palliative Care in Community Hospitals in the Borders identified variations in facilities and practices amongst the seven community hospitals and made a number of recommendations(1). It has also been identified that there is a significant variation in the use made of the Specialist Palliative Care Service and the Marie Curie Out Of Hours Nursing Service between different primary care teams(2,3). Thus it has been demonstrated that there is not an equitable provision of palliative care to patients in all parts of the Borders.

1.3 In the last two years there have been a number of new initiatives developed by the Specialist Palliative Care Service and the Macmillan GP Facilitator. These include

  • an ongoing multidisciplinary educational programme for primary care teams following an audit of educational needs
  • an assessment of out of hours palliative care with the development of a handover form and the current development of a network of trained palliative care pharmacists to ensure the provision of necessary palliative care drugs at all times
  • a palliative care newsletter published every 6 months with news and educational content (Appendix 7 - "In Touch")
  • a palliative care website for both health professionals and patients/carers (www.in-touch.org.uk)
  • an audit of Palliative Care in Community Hospitals in the Borders(1)

1.4 Future developments include the building of a new Cancer Resource for patients and carers, which will integrate the Oncology and Palliative Care Services, and the appointment of a Lead Cancer Nurse.

2 AIMS

2.1 Primary aim
The prime aim of this MCN would be to support the patient with palliative care needs at all stages in his/her journey of care and to ensure equity of access to the highest standards of care, provided by an integrated multi-disciplinary team. The primary focus will be on the palliative care needs of patients with cancer and the top priority will be improvement in the management of pain.

2.2 Secondary aims
In order to achieve this the aims detailed in the SPA's Framework for the Operation of Managed Clinical Networks in Palliative Care have been adapted for the Borders MCN as follows:

  • To create effective, efficient communication links between health professionals and with patients and carers, and to co-ordinate palliative care provision across primary and secondary care, including community hospitals and nursing homes
  • To ensure that palliative care of an equally high standard is available to everyone who needs it throughout the Borders region
  • To improve standards of palliative care by promoting evidence based practice, with the management of pain as the first priority, and by a programme of continuous professional development for members of the Network
  • To ensure that a system to audit the outcome of evidence based practice is in place and that results are disseminated timeously to those in the Network
  • To ensure that patients and carers have the information and understanding they need to make choices about their palliative care and, wherever possible, to provide the service and the support required in an environment of the patient's choosing.

2.3 Other Primary Care oriented MCNs
Existing MCNs are based almost entirely in secondary and tertiary care. An additional aim of this proposal is to produce a workable template, centred on primary care, to enable the development of other primary care oriented MCNs both within and outwith the Borders. It is envisaged that this pilot MCN could be further developed to provide an integrated Cancer and Palliative Care MCN for the Borders.

3 WHY DEVELOP A NETWORK?

3.1 The development of a clinical network in palliative care with managerial support would enable the co-ordinated development of new initiatives in all parts of the Borders. Enhancing communication between health professionals at the primary secondary care interface, and improving the provision of information to health professionals and patients/carers would undoubtedly raise the standard of patient care.

3.2 A network would ensure the co-ordinated implementation of evidence based practice such as the SIGN Guidelines on Pain, the CSBS Core Standards on Palliative Care and the sharing of good ideas/practice. It would provide the resource and skills essential to the effective audit of standards.

3.3 A clinical network would be able to address those areas of care currently provided on an inequitable basis and audit the results of the measures taken. It would also ensure the active involvement of patients/carers in the future development of palliative care services in the Borders.

3.4 A MCN would therefore unite current and future initiatives in the Borders, and national guidelines and standards, within a framework that would enable audit and review of progress. The co-ordinated implementation of these proposals would be difficult to achieve without the framework and resource of a MCN.

4 CLINICAL COMPONENTS OF THE NETWORK

These are based on the draft Standards for Palliative Care issued by the CSBS (relevant standards are quoted below in italics). The development team intend to address each of these components in the following ways:

4.1 Symptom Management
"Palliative Care is provided in accordance with relevant SIGN guidelines or where these do not exist in accordance with good practice guidelines which are evidence based as far as possible."

  • Promoting best clinical practice by adapting and implementing evidence based guidelines and national standards.
  • The management of pain will be the first priority of the network which is committed to locally adapting and implementing SIGN Guideline 44 Control of Pain in Patients with Cancer.
  • The network is also committed to developing local evidence based guidelines on symptom management where no nationally agreed guidelines exist

4.2 Assessment and Care Planning
"All patients with cancer will have their palliative care needs assessed, documented and acted upon."

  • Ensuring that the patient's most important problems are identified and recorded
  • Encouraging a multidisciplinary, multi-agency approach to solving these problems and implementing "Care Management" planning
  • Developing robust administrative systems, particularly around admission to and discharge from hospital, in order to ensure seamless patient care.

To facilitate these processes the further development of the existing nursing patient held record in the Borders would be a priority, which should be further augmented by suitable electronic systems enabling audit and sharing of information throughout the network

4.3 Equipment
"All patients receiving palliative care will have timely delivery of essential equipment."

  • Developing a system to ensure the ready availability and delivery of appropriate equipment within 24 hours

4.4 Drugs
"Prescribed essential drugs are obtainable when required (including "out of hours" for patients at home)"

  • Ensuring that the mechanisms are in place for team members to have access to responsive drug information services.
  • Continuing development and integration of the Palliative Care Pharmacists Network to ensure rapid access to immediately necessary drugs
  • Encouraging all professionals to prescribe in accordance with locally agreed guidelines

4.5 Education and Training
"All health professionals in cancer services will undertake cancer specific professional education and development including the principles and philosophy of palliative care."

Facilitating an ongoing training programme based on the individual needs of all professionals in the network.

Basing education on evidence of best clinical practice

4.6 Communication and Continuity of Care
Good communication between members of the network and continuity of care between hospital and community are essential to high quality patient care. This area could be improved by

  • Revising discharge communications to make sure that both content and mode (letter, telephone, e-mail, fax etc) are tailored to the needs of the primary care team
  • Formal telephone contact times for health professionals to contact the Consultant in Palliative Medicine
  • Formal arrangement for 24-hour specialist palliative care advice
  • Further development of the existing nursing patient held record
  • Encouraging use of the palliative care out of hours handover forms (Appendix 6)
  • Increasing the extent of upto date, relevant, clinical information on the website for easy reference by health professionals
  • Increasing the extent of locally adapted patient information on the website
  • Continuing to provide a regular newsletter with information about the MCN, feedback and clinical information (Appendix 7)
  • Implementing regular meetings between specialist palliative care and all primary care teams. These should probably be multi-professional case conferences or meetings to discuss the management of more complex individual patient care. They could either be practice based or community hospital based.

4.7 Feedback for Health Professionals on their Performance
"Prospective clinical audit must become an integral part of cancer services. The aim of clinical audit is to engage all professional health care staff in the systematic and critical examination of their practice and to demonstrate quality of care and outcomes."

  • The outcomes from clinical audit will be fed back to primary care teams in a timeous fashion. Results will be placed in the context of anonymised data from other primary care teams to allow comparison and help identify clinically important variations in practice and encourage examination of the reasons for these.

5 COVERAGE, MEMBERSHIP, STRUCTURE AND MANAGEMENT

5.1 Coverage
It is envisaged that the network will cover the entire Borders Health Board area. This comprises the Borders Primary Care Trust, Borders LHCC, Borders West LHCC and Borders General Hospital NHS Trust. It encompasses 22 practices, 7 community hospitals, 17 nursing homes and 1 specialist palliative care team. There is no hospice within the Borders.

5.2 Membership and Structure
Membership of the network is open to any health professional in the Borders who is involved in palliative care. All members must be willing to practice in accordance with the SIGN Guideline on the Control of Pain in Patients with Cancer, and with any other evidence based guidelines adopted by the network or local good practice guidelines developed by it. All members must also be willing to participate in a continuous programme of audit. Network structure and membership are detailed in Appendices 2,3 and 4

5.3 Management
The Lead Consultant will have overall responsibility for the operation of the network. He will be assisted in this role by a Lead General Practitioner, a Lead Clinical Nurse Specialist and a Lead Pharmacist. For the network to be successful it is essential that dedicated time is made available so that these key clinicians can be involved in the development and implementation of the initiatives set out in this document. A Network Manager will be responsible for the day to day running of the network under the direction of the clinicians. These individuals will collectively form the Palliative Care Executive Group (Appendix 3).

6 INVOLVEMENT OF PATIENTS AND CARERS

Patients and carers will be involved in the network in the following ways

  • A patient representative is present on the Palliative Care Steering Group
  • Patients' and carers' views on the service will be sought by means of questionnaires
  • Patients' and carers' views will be sought on the development of patient/carer information and the most appropriate ways of making it available

7 EVALUATION OF THE PROJECT

7.1 Audit Facilitator
To enable evaluation of the project it is essential that the network has a part-time audit facilitator proficient in setting up databases using Microsoft Access.

7.2 Baseline Audit

  • A baseline audit is already underway through visits to all primary care teams in the Borders to identify areas for improvement and development in palliative care provision. This also takes the form of a consultation exercise as it was felt essential that primary care teams' views were sought on how such a managed clinical network would operate and how it would encompass the Core Standards for Palliative Care and the SIGN Guidelines on the Management of Pain in Patients with Cancer. A consultation/audit document has been produced based on the Scottish Partnership Agency's working party report and MEL (1999)10 (Appendix 1).
  • An audit of palliative care in community hospitals in the Borders has also been carried out recently and a list of suggestions for improvements was formulated(1). This could be updated if necessary.
  • The data specified in the Clinical Standards Board for Scotland Standards for Palliative Care should also be collected as a baseline.

7.3 Audit and Final Evaluation

  • Improvement in the management of pain has been identified as the top priority for the network. Collection of the Minimum Core Data Set from SIGN Guideline 44 will form the basis of the audit to assess to what extent this aim has been achieved. This will form a continuous audit throughout the 2 years of the pilot.
  • A repeat of the baseline audits among primary care teams and of community hospitals will establish the success of these initiatives.
  • The data specified in the Clinical Standards Board for Scotland Standards for Palliative Care will be collected at the end of the 2 year pilot.
  • Finally it is hoped to be able to demonstrate the following benefits specified in the SPA Report4 by the end of the MCN pilot
    • Improved communication
    • More collaborative working
    • Increased patient satisfaction and choice
    • Better symptom management o Greater continuity of care across hospital and community o Improved access to specialist advice and support for health professionals
    • Feedback for health professionals on their performance

7.4 Annual Report
The network will produce a written annual report for the Health Board, Trusts and LHCCs which would be available to the public through the website.

8 CLINICAL GOVERNANCE

The network intends to work in collaboration with the 2 NHS Trusts and the 2 LHCCs with regard to Clinical Governance. It is committed to implementing national quality standards and guidelines. The Borders LHCC is in the process of introducing a pilot scheme for Continuous Professional Development in Primary Care Teams and this presents a unique opportunity for working with the MCN to achieve a common goal.

9 APPLICATION FOR FUNDING - HOW DOES IT FIT WITH PRIORITIES?

9.1 The proposal sets out to improve cancer care by enhancing the provision of effective palliative care and associated support and information services. It would do this by

  • Equity: working towards equitable provision of palliative care services for all patients in all parts of the Borders
  • Patients: involving patients/carers in the development of their service
  • Quality: developing a quality assurance programme involving ongoing audit of clinical care and collection of data in accordance with the recommendations of the CSB
  • Audit & Outcomes: Ensuring that audit results and outcome measures are disseminated timeously to those involved in patient care in order to enable further improvements in service provision.
  • Integration: Creating links with the cancer services in the Borders in order to ensure that the Palliative Care Managed Clinical Network is an integral part of cancer treatment and existing cancer networks
  • Consultation: consulting fully with all interested parties
  • Communication: improving communication between all members of the network
  • Information Technology: developing and promoting the use of existing IT, such as e-mail and the internet, to improve communication and investigating the use of teleconferencing for educational and clinical meetings
  • Cost effectiveness: ensuring that cost effectiveness is a consideration in developing the service

9.2 The proposal is also designed to enable the further development of the concept of MCNs by piloting a network in palliative care. Most networks are currently secondary and tertiary care based and this project would therefore be piloting a network based mainly in primary care. It is envisaged that it could provide a model for other primary care orientated networks.

10 BIBLIOGRAPHY

  1. Cormie PJ. Palliative Care in Community Hospitals in the Borders. Scottish Borders: Borders Primary Care Trust, 1999
  2. Rodgers J. Utilisation of the Specialist Palliative Care Service. Scottish Borders: Borders General Hospital Trust, 1998
  3. Romanes J. Utilisation of Marie Curie Out of Hours Nursing Service. Scottish Borders: Borders Primary Care Trust, 1999
  4. Scottish Partnership Agency for Palliative and Cancer Care. A Framework for the Operation of Managed Clinical Networks in Palliative Care. Edinburgh: SPAPCC 1999
  5. CSBS Palliative Care Cancer Project Group. Core Principles of Cancer Care and Standards for Palliative Care. Edinburgh: Clinical Standards Board for Scotland 2000
  6. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Control of Pain in Patients with Cancer. Edinburgh: SIGN 2000

Appendix 1

SCOTTISH BORDERS PALLIATIVE CARE SERVICE
PROPOSED MANAGED CLINICAL NETWORK
INFORMATION FOR PRIMARY CARE TEAMS

INTRODUCTION

The concept of Managed Clinical Networks (MCN) was set out in the report of the Acute Services Review published in June 1998 and the core principles were further defined in NHS MEL(1999)10.

Definition
MCNs are defined as linked groups of health professionals and organisations from primary, secondary and tertiary care, working in a co-ordinated manner, unconstrained by existing professional and Health Board boundaries, to ensure equitable provision of high quality clinically effective services throughout Scotland.

Core Principles - MEL(1999)10

  • each Network must have clarity about Network management arrangements, including the appointment of a person who is recognised as having overall responsibility for the operation of the Network, whether a lead clinician, a clinical manager or otherwise. Each Network should produce a written annual report to the appropriate Health Board or Trust, which would also be available to the public
  • each Network must have a defined structure which sets out the points at which the service is to be delivered, and the connections between them
  • each Network must have a clear statement of the specific clinical and service improvements which patients could expect as a result of the establishment of the Network
  • each Network must use a documented evidence base, such as SIGN guidelines where these are available, and must be committed to expansion of the evidence base through appropriate R & D
  • each Network must be truly multi-disciplinary/multi-professional and should include representation from patients' organisations in its management arrangements
  • each Network must have a clear policy on the dissemination of information to patients, and the nature of that information, bearing in mind the role of primary care in helping to lead the patient through the system
  • all the health professionals who would make up the Network must indicate their willingness to practice in accordance with the evidence base and with the general principles governing Networks
  • an integral part of each Network must be a quality assurance programme acceptable to the Clinical Standards Board for Scotland (CSBS), which also has a role in ensuring consistency of standards and quality of treatment across all MCNs
  • the educational and training potential for Networks should be used to the full, through exchanges between those working in the community and primary care and those working in hospitals/specialist centres. Networks' potential to contribute to the development of the intermediate specialist concept should also be kept in mind, and Networks should develop appropriate affiliations to universities, the Colleges and SCPMDE
  • all health professionals in the Network must produce audit data to required standards and participate in open review of results
  • all Networks must include arrangements to circulate staff in ways which improve patient access, and enable professional skills to be maintained. Each Network should have an appropriate programme of continuous professional development in place for every member of the Network, as well as a mechanism for ensuring the programme is being followed
  • there must be evidence that the potential for Networks to generate better value for money has been explored

The Scottish Partnership Agency has produced a working party report detailing a Framework for Managed Clinical Networks in Palliative Care and areas to pilot these are being sought - see Scottish Executive HDL (2000) 10. Additionally the CSBS have produced Core Standards for Palliative Care and the SIGN Guidelines for the Management of Pain in Patients with Cancer have recently published.

We feel it is important that primary care teams' views are sought on how such a MCN would operate and how it would encompass the Core Standards for Palliative Care and the SIGN Guidelines. The following pages contains some of our thoughts around the establishment of a MCN in Palliative Care and will form the basis of our discussions with primary care teams in the Borders.

PROPOSED MANAGED CLINICAL NETWORK IN PALLIATIVE CARE
DISCUSSION POINTS FOR PRIMARY CARE TEAMS

The following headings are important components of a MCN. For each component the elements currently in place are listed first followed by the developments that may be required to form an effective MCN. We would value your views/suggestions on the following issues and any other matters surrounding the proposal.

1. Communication
(a) Health Professionals

Elements Currently in Place

  • clinical letters
  • telephone
  • e-mail
  • face-to-face between Clinical Nurse Specialists and Primary Care Team Members
  • newsletter
  • website
  • handover sheet for the out of hours services

Possible Developments

  • formal meetings between specialist palliative care and primary care teams. These should probably be multi-professional case conferences or meetings to discuss the management of more complex individual patient care. They could either be practice based or community hospital based.
  • Formal telephone contact times for health professionals to contact the Consultant in Palliative Medicine
  • formal arrangement for 24-hour specialist palliative care advice
  • review the current format of discharge letters. What content and layout would be most suitable for primary care teams? By what method would be like discharge information conveyed - letter, telephone or e-mail?
  • Review methods of communicating patient information amongst health professionals. Should we have patient held records for cancer/palliative care or should all health professionals be encouraged to write in a patient's existing nursing records?

(b) Patients and Carers

Elements Currently in Place

  • leaflets: palliative care service, patient advice leaflets
  • website: care directory, palliative care service
  • Palliative Care Steering Group: membership includes the Local Health Council

Possible Developments

  • Patient Held Records: should we extend the use of the existing community nursing records or implement a new PHR?
  • Leaflets: extend the range of patient/carer advice leaflets

2. Evidence Based Practice

Elements Currently in Place

  • Pain guidelines
  • nausea and vomiting guidelines
  • "Duns Good Practice Guidelines"
  • guidelines on symptoms other than pain are on the website
  • specialist practitioners keep upto date with current research from palliative care journals which is passed on in the newsletter

Possible Developments

  • SIGN Guidelines on Pain
  • further guidelines on symptoms other than pain

3. Education/Continuous Professional Development

Elements Currently in Place

  • Multidisciplinary education programme on symptom control and communication based around Borders Community Hospitals
  • regional topical meetings e.g. ethics, lymphoedema and palliative care out of hours
  • educational articles in the newsletter
  • educational content on the website
  • an educational needs assessment survey has been completed for general practitioners
  • an educational programme is underway for community pharmacists
  • education of patients and carers e.g. in the principles of pain management is already carried out on an informal basis by the Clinical Nurse Specialists, General Practitioners and the Consultant in Palliative Medicine

Possible Developments

  • Multi-professional case conferences or meetings to discuss the management of more complex individual patient care
  • clinical/educational attachments: increase the exchange of staff between hospital and primary care to increase sharing of skills and knowledge
  • "Link Nurses"

4. Audit

Elements Currently in Place

  • audits carried out in Duns?
  • Audits in pain management in community hospitals?
  • Surveys: syringe driver protocol, educational preferences of general practitioners
  • Audit of Palliative Care in Community Hospitals in the Borders

Possible Developments

  • Formal audits starting with pain management and possibly using the SIGN Guidelines for Pain minimum data set
  • timeous feedback of audits to health professionals
  • audit of palliative care out of hours: use of the handover form and use of the new pharmacist service
  • audit of operation of service/patient pathways

5. Information for Patients and Carers

Elements Currently in Place

  • Information leaflet on the palliative care service
  • patient advice leaflets: disease, treatments, benefits
  • resource directory on website
  • patient/carer meetings with health professionals occur on an informal basis in the patient's home, hospital or the GPs surgery

Possible Developments

  • coordination of all available information e.g. patient packs containing information on the palliative care service, benefits, disease specific information
  • separate patient area in website

6. Other Areas to Be Considered

The following points also require discussion and are dealt with in more detail in the proposal document to be submitted to the Scottish Executive

  • management arrangements:
  • decision making processes
  • membership (must include patients and carers)
  • Clinical Governance:
    • Clinical Standards Board for Scotland
    • SIGN Guidelines on Pain
    • referral and discharge information
    • local good practice guidelines
    • audit
  • value for money
  • resources

 

Appendix 2
Network Structure and Management

Appendix 3
Group Roles and Memberships in the Network

ROLES

MEMBERSHIP

Palliative Care Steering Group

  • Policy decisions
  • Oversee planning and implentation of strategy

  • Borders Health Board
  • Borders Primary Care Trust
  • Borders General Hospital Trust
  • Local Health Care Co-operative
  • Social Work
  • Local Health Council
  • Voluntary Sector
  • Lead Cancer Nurse

Palliative Care Executive Group

  • Planning and implementation of policy
  • Audit
  • Communication
  • Education
  • Information management and technology
  • MCN Manager
  • Lead Consultant
  • Lead Clinical Nurse Specialist in Palliative Care
  • Lead General Practitioner
  • Lead Pharmacist

Palliative Care Operations Group

  • Planning continuing care in complex cases (local interpretation of MEL 22 1997)
  • Management of associated budget
  • Assistant Director of Nursing, Borders Primary Care Trust
  • Nurse representative for Community Hospitals
  • Social Work – Community
  • Social Work – Hospital
  • Clinical Nurse Specialist in Palliative Care
  • Community Nurse West LHCC - 1
  • Community Nurses Borders LHCC - 4

Cancer Steering Group

  • Oversee planning and development of cancer services in the Borders
  • Borders Health Board
  • Borders Primary Care Trust
  • Borders General Hospital Trust
  • Local Health Care Co-operative
  • Social Work
  • Local Health Council
  • Lothian University Hospitals Trust
  • Lead Cancer Nurse

Appendix 4
Management Structure of the Managed Clinical Network

 


[Top of Page] [Home] [Network] [Services] [Directory] [WebLinks] [Contact Us]]

www.in-touch.org.uk : Scottish Borders Palliative Care & Macmillan GPFacilitator Information Site. Last updated 12 November 2001 by Paul Cormie, Lead GP, Borders Palliative Care Network.